I can easily see how the FBI, Weiner and FBI Director Comey could impact the election. I suspect what they did in the two weeks before the election was decisive. Wikileaks is another matter.
When the anti-Clinton Wikileaks came out before the election, the concensus here was that they were "nothing burgers". I have not seen any stories posted by DK staff before the election, saying there was anything significant in Wikileaks regarding Clinton.
What were the anti-Clinton Wikileaks that were so powerful to cause voters to change their vote and therefore instead of Hillary Clinton as the first woman President, we got Trump the first … (you fill in the blank).
What was the Wikileak(s) that lost the election? Was it:
- the CNN commentator leaking debate questions to the HRC campaign?
- HRC’s daughter not get along well with the head of the Clinton Foundation?
- Podesta and others emails about how HRC should have been more forthcoming with the email server issue, to get the issue behind her before the election?
- Is there a more significant Wikileak than the above that reached the public, if so what was it?
None of the above in my mind could have changed the opinions of voters, especially when FBI Director’s “activities received far, far, far greater news coverage than anything from WIkileaks durning the final two weeks of the election.
Of the people I know who did not vote for Clinton, none mentioned anything from Wilileaks as rhe reason they did not vote for Clinton.
was there an the election changing Wikileaks? I can’t find any. If I overlooked that decisive Wikileak please tell us what it was.